Monday, September 14, 2015

What Would We Do Without the Wonderful World Wide Web?

Back to the Past, and Into the Future


The evolution of the Web has greatly expanded over the past few decades; that is no life-altering, mind-blowing statement. What is mind-blowing, and certainly life-altering is how the Web has changed throughout this time period, surpassing what I thought could even be possible for technology to accomplish. Although I was too young to witness the beginnings of switching from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0, I can see the significant changes that have developed since the days of archaic dial up computers and simplistic interface web pages. For example, if anything takes longer than 5 seconds to load, irritation sets in, or how about being able to take a tablet with you anywhere in the world and still access the Internet? We have come leaps and bounds from where we first began in the field of Web and the Internet.


Starting with Web 1.0, we were able to present information and services with simple user interfaces, but had no opportunity to allow people to alter or contribute to the information. Well that just wouldn’t do, now would it? Which is precisely where Web 2.0 came in. This new and improved version of the Web offers users the chance to be interactive with people from all over the world, access thousands of pages of information in seconds, and upload their work to share with whomever they please. Now that the Web has been nailed down in a socially interactive aspect, it is time to focus on new technological advances, which brings me to discuss Web 3.0. Web 3.0 takes what we already know how to use and amps it up by 100, creating more intelligent search engines and faster network connections that give us what we want to know and take us exactly where we want to be in seconds, with more accuracy and precision than what we have been used to.

I believe Web 2.0 has surpassed the expectations of what people thought was possible to accomplish with computer technology. Everyday there are new applications and user experiences created that enhance the Web’s quality and productivity. Web 2.0 has given users a way to connect with their friends and family, not just through simply a wordy email, but actually video chatting with them in real time. In my opinion that is the greatest thing that has come out of the transition from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0, the ability to link together family and friends across the globe and allow them to see each other face-to-face.

With Web 3.0 becoming more developed to serve us faster and make our lives easier, I am afraid there will be an increase in how addicted to technology human civilization already is. Web 3.0 has the ability to connect databases in seconds to find information that much easier and it troubles me to think it may decrease the willingness to learn, or increasing the dependency to having a computer do all the hard work for you.

How have we gotten to this point?


Web 1.0 or the “Read Only” web was the beginning of the information age, according to Flat World Business Blog. Though this version of the web gave users access to information, there was no active communication flow from users to those sending out that information. Along with giving access to data Web 1.0 also began the e-commerce revolution, allowing consumers to view and buy product online versus in a retailer’s store. According to WittyCookie, Web 1.0 is the passive version of the web filled with flat data and no outlet to communicate with users.

Transitioning from that is Web 2.0, or the “Read-Write” web, where a lack of interaction from Web 1.0 led to. According to Randy Matusky, owner of randymatusky.com, a blog dedicated to educational technology and leadership, no actual update or technical modification was done between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. A writer on Flat World Business Blog stated that 1999 marked the start of heavier user interactions and the “Read-Write-Publish” era, with sites like Blogger and LiveJournal. This version of the web is set up so that even a non-technically savvy individual can navigate and intermingle on the web. Randy Matusky, in his blog post here, he declares Web 2.0 is the “architecture of participation” because the user has some power and control over the data being distributed. Web 2.0 empowered the population through blogging, social media, and video streaming.

Lastly, the Web is transitioning into its latest phase, Web 3.0 or the “Read-Write-Execute” web version. Flat World Business blog, in their post here, it is stated that Web 3.0 is made up of two things; semantic markup and web services. First, semantic makeup is the communication gap that exists between web users and computer applications, which will be remedied through formatting data to be understood by software. Second, we service is a system designed to support computer to computer interaction over the Internet. Flat World Blog states that both semantic markup and web service will have the potential to have applications connect directly with each other, with broader search engines, and easier interfaces. The problem with 2.0, according to Randy Matusky, is that Web 2.0 results in information overload. It is unable to tell whether context is relevant or not, the search just generates all relevant data, which is precisely what Web 3.0 aims to change. Matusky says it well when he writes in his blog post, “Web 1.0 and 2.0 the Internet is trapped within the physical walls of computers, bur with hands-free devices such as tablets and cellphones, it will become an omnipresent force.”

No comments:

Post a Comment